Of America One
Luiz Olympio Telles de Menezes. Kardec comments: ‘ ‘ .With effect, great courage of opinion to criair in a refractory country is necessary as Brazil a destined agency to popularize ours ensinamentos.’ ‘ Kardec still says: ‘ ‘ .For us, the Espiritismo does not have to tend for no definitive religious form. It is and must continue as a tolerant and gradual philosophy, opening its arms to all the disinherited ones, whichever the nationality and the certainty the one that pertenam.’ ‘ (grifo ours). Kardec extracted some tickets of this publication, which we could not leave to cite. There they go: ‘ ‘ The phenomenon of manifestation of the Espritos is wonderful, appearing and becomeing vulgar for all parte.’ ‘ ‘ ‘ Known since the most remote antiquity, we see it in full century nineteen today, renewed and observed for the first time in northern America, in the United States, where if it produced for uncommon diverse object movements, noises, really extraordinary collisions! ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ Of America it passed quickly to the Europe and there, mainly in France, to the handle of some years it left the domain of the curiosity and entered in the vast field of the Cincia.’ ‘ ‘ ‘ New ideas, emanated then of thousand of communications, gotten of the revelations of the Espritos that if revealed, want spontaneously, want for mandate, had given place to the birth of an eminently philosophical doctrine that, in few years, gave the return to the Land and penetrates in all the nations, enlisting, in each one of them, so great number of proslitos that today are counted to milhes.’ ‘ ‘ ‘ The idea of the Espiritismo it was not conceived by nobody; consequently, nobody is its autor.’ ‘ ‘ ‘ If the Espritos if had not revealed, for spontaneously certain the Espiritismo would not exist. Therefore, the Espiristimo is a question in fact, and not of opinion, not being able the denials of the incredulity to take advantage against this fato.’ ‘ ‘ ‘ ….. E, however, the Espiritismo is not exclusive privilege of nobody. Any person, in the privacy of its family, can find one mdium in some of its relatives, and then she will be able, if wanting, making its proper comments; but it does not have you make them with precipitation, to its way, nor circumscribe them it the circle of its prevention or of its preconceptions, it stops later concluding emphatically for the negation of what, by any circumstance, could not be studied, therefore, he was badly understood, it is before a test of levity of what of sabedoria.’ ‘ I recommend the published integral reading in the Magazine Esprita of November of 1.869..
Today virtually every business faces the need to transfer to their work. And many are asking themselves the question: Whom do you choose the translation or private translators freelancer? We will not blame anyone for any praise, just try to look at the possible pros and cons of co-operation. The main argument in favor of cooperation with the private interpreter – is, of course, lower prices for services than for translation companies. And this is a major factor when choosing a freelancer. Positive also for the customer is that the price can negotiate as a freelance translator is always trying to take the order and may accept less pay just to do not lose it. As for drawbacks, the first, all translators are people, they can get sick leave, there may be unforeseen situations.
This movement lasted one month more than and involved laborers of all the branches of the industry, as metallurgist, masons, shoemakers, marble workers and seedbeds, graphs, teceles, hat makers, dressmakers, workers in wood. It is important to detach that the wages were not paid during the strikes, being thus, many times the laborers finished coming back to the work without nothing to obtain. The conquests gotten with the strikes never were definitive. Therefore, from time to time, the laborers entered in strike; in 1906, the railroad workers of So Paulo had stopped for better conditions of work and wages; in 1912-1913, laboring of some categories they had 1912-1913 made strikes against the high prices of the life and for better wages. First the great movement striker of syndical history in Brazil that paralyzed the city of So Paulo in 1917, was initiated with strikes located in txteis plants, in the quarters of the Moca and the Ipiranga. The leaders strikers demanded better wages and better conditions of work, beyond the requirement of suppression of the contribution ' ' pr-ptria' ' (campaign of financial support to Italy, developed for the immigrant bourgeoisie of So Paulo, arriving until making discountings of the wages of the workers, as it was the case of the Cotonifcio Crespi).
The classic administration has as bedding the principles of the administration of implanted prussiano Exercito in the Europe in the last century and Brazil in 1936. In turn the bureaucratic administration happened as method of substitution of the centralizadora absolute monarchy of the public patrimony as in such a way private. For the development of the capitalism, the state separation was necessary and market, inasmuch as the democracy existence is only possible when it distinguishes from market of the society controls that it, was in this I contest that the separation between the public and the private one appeared. With effect, the bureaucratic administration can be understood as precarious, slow, expensive, and without the had orientation. She was with this spirit of change, that the State stimulated the due changes not only aiming at the improvement of the public service, but separation of the particular patrimony to the one of the private one. The Public administration passed to be delineated in 1930, that she was improved in 1967 with the call second reform, by means of the implementation of (Dasp), occurs that the initial kick left in 1938, with the creation of the Autarchies, leaving of the estimated one that the public power must be decentralized (indirect administration).
The paradigm adopted for many to make public administration privileging one alone to be able, absolute and irresponsible with characteristics well next to the proposal of the Hobbesianismo -, is of responsibility of who makes separately it, not of executive all governmental that has courage to carry through the participativo budget, for example. She is necessary to pontuar that in some cases the agreement of that the social control is a participativo instrument of the society, exerted mainly for the advice, that must be pautado democratically by the politics and/or the legal right, not for the will of the men, public good, above of the particular fondness has happened not. Any position that does not prioritize the endorsed collective interest in the impessoalidade, the morality and the equity, is the consolidation of the shunting line of behavior, appropriate and waited for who if it considers to be public agent. If it considers if manager with seriousness and commitment, the debates established in conferences and the advice of rights must accepted and be reflected as mechanisms that they corroborate for the half good of what he is public when pointing that they make possible to perfect the management, they reduce, they eliminate or they prevent wastefulnesses, the shunting lines and the malversaes in the application of the public resources. Such instances search to assure that the public and social managers if compromise to the excellency in the conception and implementation of the programs, projects and services.