Browsed by
Month: January 2019

Commander Hugo Chavez

Commander Hugo Chavez

Before the amendment in Cabimas PPT result it assumes its responsibility although we regret the mechanical reissue of the result obtained on 23 November last year, it is appropriate to collect glasses and analyze the subject away from prejudices from the critical point of view. Many people afraid to sit and discuss the because winning the alcaldia de Cabimas with fellow Felix Bracho lost the amendment with fellow Hugo Chavez three months later. Could it be that most people Chavez and revolutionary of Cabimas wants more Felix than to own Commander Hugo Chavez? This question can generate other more that does not come to the case dealt with in this attempt at analysis that I am obliged to make before the arrogance of some colleagues who celebrate having fulfilled the goal of 60 thousand votes, when in my neurons had the idea of winning and others who throw the donkey pal monte to the Commander with the scarcity of resources producing sway of words that never had to leave the fraternal debate in the intimacy of the party to which they belong or failing in the bosom of the local Patriotic Alliance where it is assumed we all grouped together. They should not rejoice in opposition since they also left with a lead in the wing. And say this because this demonstrated that a political analysis cannot be never solved with a mathematical operation and although both alert to our membership and our allies about the fear to repeat the result from November 23, this alert was received as a fatalistic message by Deputy hair who in a meeting with the Alliance said in a triumphalist tone than the victory in Cabimas was irreversible as we had removed the Mayor’s Office to the opposition and had fired more than 3,000 employees and who for this reason were politically bruised. After a hard work undertaken by our electoral post we form the Patriotic Alliance, in a modest effort made with the intention to constitute a collective leadership of the process in Cabimas.

Julen Benda

Julen Benda

JULIEN BENDA (1867-1956) do more to stay in the line that drew us these elder brothers, continue in the direction of the true intellectualism, contributing, with all our soul, the tribute of our accession to the Government of Republican Spain, which today lies the tragic honour to represent the cause of Justice and freedom against the eternal powers of obscurantism. Julien Benda. Speech at the II Congress of writers. THE voice of an intellectual loyal the writer and philosopher Julien Benda, famous author of La Trahison des clercs (treason of the intellectuals, 1927), along with Andre Malraux, Andre Chamson, Louis Aragon, Claude Aveline, Tristan Tzara, and Rene Bloch, were the French representatives who attended the II Congress of writers convened by the International Alliance of antifascist intellectuals that gathered in Valenciain July 1937, Jose Bergamin, Corpus Barga, Antonio Machado, Pablo Neruda, Fernando de los Rios, Ramon J. Sender, Vicente Huidobro, Octavio Paz, Carlos Pellicer, Jose Mancisidor, Juan Marinello Vidaurreta, Nicolas Guillen, Alejo Carpentier, Raul Gonzalez Tunon, Pablo Rojas Paz, Cayetano Cordova Iturburu, Elena Garro, Bertolt Brecht, Ludwig Renn, Theodor Balk, Willy Bredel, Egon Erwin Kisch, Heinrich Mann, Maria Osten, Anna Segher, Kurt Stern, Gustav Regler, Erich Weinet, Ilia Ehrenburg, Ernest Hemingway, Cesar Vallejo, Rafael Dieste, Rafael Alberti, two John Passos, Martin Andersen-Nexo, UStephen Spender, Emilio Prados, Maria Teresa Leon, Arturo Serrano Plaja, Juan Gil-Albert, Herrera Petere, Lorenzo Varela, Miguel Hernandez, Ramon Gaya, Pascual Pla and Beltran, Jef Last, Malcolm Cowley, Fedor Kelyin, etc. The Mexican writer Elena Garro told us: -guys, sorry. ‘ We walk very scarce accommodation and how they are the youngest – and led us to a hostel, in which the rooms were divided by hanging sheets. Get dressed as God intended. Ponte necktie!, le said at peace. Tie?, do tie? You are going to cause me fusilen, you answered. It was an opinion. Vicente Huidobro, Julien Benda, Andre Chamson, Claude Aveline and up to the same Ilia Ehremburg wore tie In his famous work, Benda denounced what have been called the betrayal of the clercs, i.e. of intellectuals, since this betrayal is the fact that many among them had completely unknown the true values of intellectualism, to serve purely temporary interests, in particular nationalism and the interests of the bourgeois classes that, in a Word, had made policy in the low inintelectual of the word sense. Julien Benda was born in Paris on December 26, 1867 and died on June 7, 1956 in Fontenay-aux-Roses. Son of a Hebrew family was not linked to the religion of his people. He studied arts and Sciences in the school of Arts and crafts, although later, he entered the Faculty of letters, preferring, finally, by the literary studies. At the end of his life Benda leans toward left-wing parties. At the time of issue Dreyfus published in la Revue Blanche the Dialogues a. Byzance (1900). Later the French writer we say: our great novelist Emile Zola, during the Dreyfus affair, not nor betrayed his State of clerc to throw his famous I accuse to the face of the birds of prey. With his first novel the ordination (ordination L, 1912), published in Les Cahiers of the quinzeine, reaches his first success. Then publishes Le Bergsonisme, ou a mobilite (1912) philosophie, Une philosophie Pathetique (1913), Sur les succes du bergsonisme. Precede d une Reponse aux defenseurs of doctrine it (1914), works in which was opposed to Henri Bergson, defender of intuition, clearly betting on rationalism. During the first world war exercises as a journalist and published in 1917 Les sentiments de Critias and, a year later, Belphegor: essai sur Esthetique l of the presente Societe francaise. In 1927 his best-known work is La Trahison des clercs, whose theories being consolidated in subsequent works, among which we highlight two political essays Discours a la nation Europeenne (1933) and the grande epreuve des democraties: essai sur principes les democratiques: leur nature, leur histoire, leur valeur philosophique (1942). In his speech to the European nation, the work of full today, tells us: great merit of Europe, in my opinion, would be to allow that one ever greater number of French – although the rule applies, of course, the Germans, the Italians, the Spaniards, can say: I’m not French but European of French origin. Also writes some autobiographical works as the jeunesse d a clerc (1936), a regulier dans le siecle (1938) and Les cahiers d a clerc, 1936-1949 (1950), and as said the loyal intellectual: left men can declare their aims, the men of right not. Francisco Arias Solis future WINS, gaining freedom. For peace and freedom and Forum free Internet portal. URL: Original author and source of the article.

Commitment

Commitment

Engagement rings are special jewels made to seal a promise of union. Most carry diamonds, but all have an important value, the cost of their materials either by design or simply for its sentimental value. do you want to know and see more about them? Engagement rings are at the moment only fortune for women, even though they aren’t a step required for a compromise, are perhaps the most important gifts that can make them their boyfriends. They symbolize a coming marriage and a future of love and sometimes accompanied, for the more traditional, a party of ordered. How are No engagement rings there is a strict protocol in this regard; the habit they are rings of gold and diamonds and, preferably, more eye-catching than the wedding. Usually gold or white or yellow (rarely pink), and diamonds, white.

There are jewelers who also design in Platinum. The most typical design is the solo or stone set engagement ring ring. Is often preferred in recent times Let this be white gold and more carats better. Another classic option is an alliance with same bright where the unique and outgoing piece by rows of several embedded smaller shall be replaced. On the other hand, according to jewelry that usually have the future wife, the ring can be simply special and more expensive than what she normally carry. Meaning of the diamond ring to compromise the high value of the gem (which today can be a bracelet or earrings) means since the middle ages the pretender railway intends to carry out liaison with the Lady. It is the sign of a pre-contract.

In fact, the first known such silver ring was iron and already wore a diamond. Maximiliano de Austria gave it to Maria de Burgundy. This ring with diamonds is put on the ring finger and as the country takes in one hand or the other. It is this finger because in it there is a vein that goes to the heart. The chosen stone is not casual, but is reminder of love and purity and of the indestructible like the Crystal in question. In fact the etymological origin of the diamond, adamas, reaffirms it: in latin means invincible. In Spain and Latin American countries he wears in his left hand, however in Catalonia is in the right and in other places as in Germany goes to the right hand after a wedding has been.