One is about a text pro-large estate owner, after all the benefited greaters will be these. The RL can be annulled in small properties, that is, up to 4 fiscal modules, but the small producer could not only be benefited. Pressure in the allied base of the congress occurs to define and to take care of to questions of agrarian reform and reduction of the poverty, not in benefit the great large estate owners who could fracionar its properties in the search for new benefits. The responsibility of the reforestation in an area already deflorestada for the plantation and conservation would add it reduction of the productivity, for the unpleasantness of the producer. The project, if approved will the same allow the maintenance of the RL in different areas of bioma, exactly is of the state territory. The approval of the new law will be able for a side to benefit the agricultural producers in another one and irregularity situation, to contribute with the increase of the deforestation in areas as the Amaznia.

To the end of the present study, optimum judgment can be affirmed, safe, that the new code will have to facilitate the legal feasibility of the ambient areas. The quarrel of the project is an controversial landmark that directly affects the national agricultural production in contrast with the preservation of biodiversity. Therefore, the definition of a new provisional remedy decree or if makes necessary, with clearer rules and procedures that the agriculturists will allow to fulfill the law and to guarantee the national public interest, saved the necessity of the legal reserve. One becomes necessary that this new law absorbs the different characteristics of each bioma. For last analysis, in both the context the law well would be applied.