Unify Financial

EU plans to blight the smokers the only low-emission alternative – using mendacious arguments and deadly consequences. The E-cigarette has enjoyed in Europe of increasing popularity, about 7 million people have already gone from tobacco smoking on this much harmless method of nicotine inhalation. Apparently the Brussels eurocracy wants to now bring this extremely positive development to a halt, what is both drive the successful transfer back in the consumption of tobacco and prevent the further spread of this product. tion. The first real opportunity to reduce the number of deaths through tobacco smoke alone about 600,000 every year in the EU – critical, is offset this with full intent. So far E-boat (how the E-cigarette users call themselves) can access customized nicotine doses former tobacco a variety of flavors and different levels. The current proposal for the directive on tobacco products foresees to deal with E-cigarettes, either as a tobacco product or can they – Yes smoking so unlearn – within this policy as a remedy with the necessary strict and lengthy approval measures for viewing. any-commerce-bancshares-inc/’>TCF Capital Solutions. And this even though the current nicotine products of pharmacy only on the basis of their presentation as a medicinal are sold, the “active”ingredient of nicotine heals here nothing. Several conclusions are exciting: evaporation is a medicine you can not put it under the non-smokers Protection Act, and that you can get used from smoking with nicotine seems although irrational, is advertised but with considerable effort by the pharmaceutical industry.

The question does affect the pharmaceutical industry in Brussels is all the more galling for this industry that since market establishment of E-cigarette sales figures for tobacco cessation products are declining. For months, the resistance of the steamer moves, many knowledgeable observations reach MEPs, among others by well-known unbiased researchers such as the doctors Jean-Francois etter (CH), Konstantinos Farsalinos (GR) and Jean-pol Tassin (F). The unholy alliance of political, media and scientists with preconceived notions and the pharmaceutical industry, not to mention the Almighty World Health Organization (WHO) – physical conditions as well as universally accepted definitions are thereby apparently ad absurdum: steam is smoke and assumptions are scientific evidence. In Brussels one entangled by the parliamentarians of the leading ENVI – and other committees currently in numerous additions to the E-cigarette, the aroma ban over commercial restrictions up to drug approval procedures, which could finance only the big pharmaceutical companies. Alone, the Legal Affairs Committee (JURI) seems to have a clear view of things, this calls for simply abolishing of the cigarette out of the tobacco products directive: a tougher regulation than for tobacco is inadmissible. This seems to be the only reason to hope to be remain undisturbed after referral of the action path on tax costs of EU citizens, to be able to steam. The unbiased observer the impression of a regulation to regulate sake is so almost mandatory. Ideology and WHO is worshipped instead of to take care of the interests of the citizen, so it seems with the aid of highly questionable methods.

Germany and France are jointly responsible for the plight of Greece Greece’s problems are always dramatic. Like rarities in some professions, such as train drivers, wages are referenced, but one of the main causes of the Greek crisis is addressed mostly: high defense spending while most EU countries one to one and a half percent of GDP for defense spending, the previous Greek Governments issued over 4% of Greek GDP on armaments. Only Germany has since 1998 sold weapons worth 45 billion euros to Greece. The entire Greece aid amounted to EUR 110 billion. On these figures, you can see the contribution of the arms on the current problems of Greece. Certainly the arms is not the only cause of the Greek crisis, but an essential. Hence, the arms exporters, Germany and France responsibility for the situation of Greece. Certainly, politicians will point out, that Arms exports to NATO countries are not subject to approval.

But if you wanted, you could define long the Aegean Sea as a flashpoint, in which all arms exports are subject to approval. Greece is needed as NATO member any armor, which puts it in the position, E.g. in a crisis to defeat Turkey. If a NATO member is attacked by a non-NATO member, momentous occurs. That must also apply if a NATO member should be attacked by a NATO member. The present Greek Government seems also to be clear, that the arms can be replaced by diplomacy and agreements with mutual benefit to relieve stresses. What should we conclude the past from the mistakes? It would make sense to put all arms contracts to the test and reverse at least the still unfulfilled. Each billion in savings will help Greece and the Greek Government in the survival – and indirectly contributes to the success of the EURO. Hans-Peter Oswald