Why to wait the state to be divided to choose local candidates? these representatives, are really representing the people? Such reality clearly is seen when it observes the innumerable projects initiated for governments and paralyzed by other posterior ones, alleging not to be of its management or not wanting to help to other parties and thus the people always it leaves losing. To divide is not the only solution, it is not the best solution. Investments in the health areas and education are necessary and can be carried through without the division. The State makes the view of the mounts of money, but which and how many are the voters and citizens who follow the investments of these resources? Or better, that fiscalizes, they charge workmanships in the public sector? If many politicians ' ' roubam' ' , they evade taxes, they deviate money, is because almost always the people, great the wronged one not it searchs its rights, it does not fiscalize, it does not read the constitution, it does not act, it complains for the neighbor, but it does not make a denunciation in the Public prosecution service, because it knows that such candidate is thief, he chooses but it; if the garbage is in the way of the street it does not make nothing, nor the least collects ' ' therefore this is not of it, was not it who jogou' '. For other opinions and approaches, find out what Roubini Global Economics has to say. Par is ours and while not to think itself as part of it will not be able to have a satisfactory development, therefore it will predominate the egoism and the separativismo. It does not have a great conquest with a separate people. The knowledge of that is millenarian the best solutions is taken in set, joined. TO DIVIDE TO IMPROVE? LVIA SRA TO SOUND OF SOUSA N 23 2 Analyzing all the factors, the division of the State is not of all badly, however, it is not of all well.
The value of market of the VALLEY (gotten for the multiplication of the number of action for the quotation in Stock market) arrived R$ 303,5 billions in 1/10/2007, surpassing, per some days, the Petrobra’s, that in that date was valid R$ 290,4 billion. In June of 2008, Petrobra’s was valid R$ 473,2 billion. ' ' tucano' ' also eira of the privatizations intended to torrar it na. It also sees what it affirmed former-Senator and former-governor of the State of Par Ana Jlia Carepa (in Daily of the Federal Senate): ' ' We cannot leave of speaking on the facts of the federal Toucan that, according to rocking of the privatizations made by the BNDES, of 1991 the 2001 privatized 68 federal public companies, 75% of all the national patrimony. (Similarly see: Nouriel Roubini). Amongst the state ones vendidas, the Valley is one of these patrimonies; which was constructed during decades, to the costs of the work of all our society.
E we can here relembrar some emblematic justifications given by government FHC to embezzle the patrimony of the nation: ' ' The privatization will diminish the deficit fiscal' ' , ' ' with the privatization the government will liberate more resources and will have more managemental capacity for the area social' ' ; or ' ' with the resource of the privatizations, the Brazilian government will reduce the debt of pas' '. nothing happened; in contrast, the public debt in the end of its mandate only grew, and congress did not have prestamento of account with the nation nor, concerning where this money mountain was inlaid. Contesting the harmful act against the Brazilian Nation, it sees what Alvaro Queiroz says in ' ' The failure of privatizaes' ' (02/12/2001): ' ' In 10 years, about 160 companies they had been vendidas, after evaluated to the light of criteria supposedly technician, but leading with the intention to prevent the prices to them.
The study it took in consideration the expenditures of legislative of all the states and of the Federal District and computed the budget, the cost of each member of the house of representatives to the year and the cost of them parliamentarians for each inhabitant in the same period. 3. More info: Jim Rogers. Proposal of Implantation of the Information of Costs in the Legislative one and the Judiciary one Considering that the beddings of the management of the public resources in Brazil and practical of planning and the finances of the government (federal, state or municipal), are subjects of interest of any Brazilian citizen, perceive it necessity to make to know to population on programs, projects and plans of Government, such as: Plurianual plan (PPA), Law of Diretrizes Oramentrias (LDO), Annual Budgetary Law (LOA), Administrative Law of Fiscal Responsibility, Contracts, Modalities of Licitation, Prescription and Public charges, fiscal results, systems of execution and accompaniment, Controls Internal. Unhappyly, in a country where the education and education not yet are priorities in the optics of the public managers, the ones who make laws not fulfill them, the ones judge that them do not put them in practical, and the majority of the population not yet is used of the reading to extract information on its rights and duties, are difficult to make to understand the beddings and principles that had guided the formularization and implementation of current arcabouo institucional and of the practical ones of management of the public finances in Brazil. The transparency vestibules are restricted to that they manage the public revenue and the gerenciadores of knowledge capable to recognize the main instruments adopted in the cycle of management of the public resources: Plurianual plan? PPA, Law of Budgetary Lines of direction? LDO, Annual Budgetary Law? LOA and Annual Financial Programming. She is necessary also that the schools include in its resumes slight knowledge of economy 11 financier since Basic Ensino and of Financial Administration in Average Ensino so that the young can understand the main definitions and classifications related with prescription and public charges, identifying the stages of the execution of the expenditure, its characterization and differentiating credit of resource as well as the main legal requirements for the generation of the prescription and the public charges.
The paradigm adopted for many to make public administration privileging one alone to be able, absolute and irresponsible with characteristics well next to the proposal of the Hobbesianismo -, is of responsibility of who makes separately it, not of executive all governmental that has courage to carry through the participativo budget, for example. She is necessary to pontuar that in some cases the agreement of that the social control is a participativo instrument of the society, exerted mainly for the advice, that must be pautado democratically by the politics and/or the legal right, not for the will of the men, public good, above of the particular fondness has happened not. Any position that does not prioritize the endorsed collective interest in the impessoalidade, the morality and the equity, is the consolidation of the shunting line of behavior, appropriate and waited for who if it considers to be public agent. If it considers if manager with seriousness and commitment, the debates established in conferences and the advice of rights must accepted and be reflected as mechanisms that they corroborate for the half good of what he is public when pointing that they make possible to perfect the management, they reduce, they eliminate or they prevent wastefulnesses, the shunting lines and the malversaes in the application of the public resources. Such instances search to assure that the public and social managers if compromise to the excellency in the conception and implementation of the programs, projects and services.
The deliberations of the conferences and the advice of rights must be respected as the fondness of the society that undertakes constants and intense movements, surrounded of contradictions, what, additionally, it demands that to trends, models, adopted positions and explicit and implicit intentions are identified, valuing at the different moments the steps given in the direction of the reinforcement of the democracy, of the improvement of the quality of life of the people and social justice. Today it is unacceptable that in any situations the manager defines for maneuvers and/or constaint of the entities, to intervene with the composition of advice, in the indications of the representatives of the civil society, being that the same ones must act independently in the social control. Practical other that it must if banished for acting in the contrahand of the exercise of the social control, is the pressure on the members of the advice, is representative of the public power or the civil society, so that they are lined up to the interests of the manager duly warned to suffer administrative, politics or exactly economic sanctions. Attempts of this nature, of neutralization of the action of the advice, are impediments important to be denounced in the MP and faced politically. Therefore, the public or agent agents of the civil society that acts in the structures of support of instrumentalizao of the social control, cannot, or she would not have to be able, to be displayed and tortured in its public and personal professional moral, therefore they play functions based on the Constitution of 1988, that is in established landmarks after-dictatorship, if seats in the idea of that how much bigger the participation of the society in the decisions on public politics, plus them will answer to the interest of the collective one. This, for consequncia, demands the overcoming and the repudiation of the traditional form of exercise of the governmental power directed toward a personal particular petty politics that, acting strong centered, is tied with the reinforcement of practical clientelistas and patrimonialistas.