The paradigm adopted for many to make public administration privileging one alone to be able, absolute and irresponsible with characteristics well next to the proposal of the Hobbesianismo -, is of responsibility of who makes separately it, not of executive all governmental that has courage to carry through the participativo budget, for example. She is necessary to pontuar that in some cases the agreement of that the social control is a participativo instrument of the society, exerted mainly for the advice, that must be pautado democratically by the politics and/or the legal right, not for the will of the men, public good, above of the particular fondness has happened not. Any position that does not prioritize the endorsed collective interest in the impessoalidade, the morality and the equity, is the consolidation of the shunting line of behavior, appropriate and waited for who if it considers to be public agent. If it considers if manager with seriousness and commitment, the debates established in conferences and the advice of rights must accepted and be reflected as mechanisms that they corroborate for the half good of what he is public when pointing that they make possible to perfect the management, they reduce, they eliminate or they prevent wastefulnesses, the shunting lines and the malversaes in the application of the public resources. Such instances search to assure that the public and social managers if compromise to the excellency in the conception and implementation of the programs, projects and services.

The deliberations of the conferences and the advice of rights must be respected as the fondness of the society that undertakes constants and intense movements, surrounded of contradictions, what, additionally, it demands that to trends, models, adopted positions and explicit and implicit intentions are identified, valuing at the different moments the steps given in the direction of the reinforcement of the democracy, of the improvement of the quality of life of the people and social justice. Today it is unacceptable that in any situations the manager defines for maneuvers and/or constaint of the entities, to intervene with the composition of advice, in the indications of the representatives of the civil society, being that the same ones must act independently in the social control. Practical other that it must if banished for acting in the contrahand of the exercise of the social control, is the pressure on the members of the advice, is representative of the public power or the civil society, so that they are lined up to the interests of the manager duly warned to suffer administrative, politics or exactly economic sanctions. Attempts of this nature, of neutralization of the action of the advice, are impediments important to be denounced in the MP and faced politically. Therefore, the public or agent agents of the civil society that acts in the structures of support of instrumentalizao of the social control, cannot, or she would not have to be able, to be displayed and tortured in its public and personal professional moral, therefore they play functions based on the Constitution of 1988, that is in established landmarks after-dictatorship, if seats in the idea of that how much bigger the participation of the society in the decisions on public politics, plus them will answer to the interest of the collective one. This, for consequncia, demands the overcoming and the repudiation of the traditional form of exercise of the governmental power directed toward a personal particular petty politics that, acting strong centered, is tied with the reinforcement of practical clientelistas and patrimonialistas.