It would be observed that the natural talentos and abilities would be pragmatically more decisive in the distribution of incomes, wealth, since more ' ' elevados' ' they would obtain to overlap itself above of excessively for the law of natural election, without appealing to the tragic conception of elimination. In clearer terms, exactly having representative positions e/o accessible chances to the all, only most apt (the ones that are more efficient, concentrates, fast in the taking of decisions etc.) would obtain atingiz them. Rawls suggests then that the terms defended and accepted in the contract are regulated for a democratic interpretation. Economic Cycles Research Institute is actively involved in the matter. In this type of argument, it is imagined that, for more advantageous than it can more be the perspective of the favored classrooms, them will not cause no damage in excessively, quite to the contrary, would bring advantages for the ones that are in inferior conditions. He is characteristic to find that, after to findar the contract, the reasonable and practicable considered principles (due to independent rationality of wanting the well general one) would be kept and the mutual expectations always would be taken care of, since each individual action would affect directly or indirectly the next one, therefore both the same belong to the system of rules and rights. Soon the beginning of the difference, that conducts the democratic interpretation, exactly possessing two directions: ' ' no change in the expectations of that they are in better position can, in this in case that, to improve the situation of little favorecidos' ' Or ' ' (…) the expectations of all the most favored of any form contribute for well-being of less favorecidos.' ' (RAWLS, p 83) it would not inhibit the posterior objection on as and because some few had only obtained to reach the positions highest, since the equitable equality of chances would not be being contemplated in this circumstance.