Certainly the source of marxist inspiration, of which both had drunk, made with that the dynamics of a society in constant conflict was in the center of the quarrels. However, not it was enougher to only analyze the society of what it consisted of its stratification. More information is housed here: KBS. From now, same society under other angles would be basic to analyze this, as the existing relations between the fields of the economy, psychology, history and the anthropology. We can perceive that the complexity if became constituent element of the current society. However, such complexity does not mean a dynamics pautada in the quantitative and qualitative diversity of the cultural productions and human beings. Today, the regression of the masses consists of the incapacity to hear what never it was heard, of palpar with the proper hands what never it was touched, a new form of ofuscamento that surpasses any mstico ofuscamento looser. Through the mediation of the total society, that mooring cable all the relations and impulses, the men are converted of new exactly into that against what the law is turned of the development of the society, the beginning of itself-exactly; in simple units of the species human being, fellow creatures some to the others, in virtue of the isolation in collective directed for the coercion.
(Id., ib., P. 112) Thus, in a dynamics of homogeneizados behaviors and massificados, it does not have more space for the authentic creative capacity. In what it refers to the half miditicos, under the conceptual dichotomy of the newness, does not have more not even the objective to hide the contradictions. If to detach does not mean more being one in one determined context, but, of absurd form, to be simply plus one in the way of one all in constant massificao. Obviously, it does not have no advantage for the capitalist mentality in developing and cultivating the true individuality.