Why to wait the state to be divided to choose local candidates? these representatives, are really representing the people? Such reality clearly is seen when it observes the innumerable projects initiated for governments and paralyzed by other posterior ones, alleging not to be of its management or not wanting to help to other parties and thus the people always it leaves losing. To divide is not the only solution, it is not the best solution. Investments in the health areas and education are necessary and can be carried through without the division. The State makes the view of the mounts of money, but which and how many are the voters and citizens who follow the investments of these resources? Or better, that fiscalizes, they charge workmanships in the public sector? If many politicians ' ' roubam' ' , they evade taxes, they deviate money, is because almost always the people, great the wronged one not it searchs its rights, it does not fiscalize, it does not read the constitution, it does not act, it complains for the neighbor, but it does not make a denunciation in the Public prosecution service, because it knows that such candidate is thief, he chooses but it; if the garbage is in the way of the street it does not make nothing, nor the least collects ' ' therefore this is not of it, was not it who jogou' '. For other opinions and approaches, find out what Roubini Global Economics has to say. Par is ours and while not to think itself as part of it will not be able to have a satisfactory development, therefore it will predominate the egoism and the separativismo. It does not have a great conquest with a separate people. The knowledge of that is millenarian the best solutions is taken in set, joined. TO DIVIDE TO IMPROVE? LVIA SRA TO SOUND OF SOUSA N 23 2 Analyzing all the factors, the division of the State is not of all badly, however, it is not of all well.